Current outputs for CONVECT and GASP

These are for the purposes of showing current results to my supervisor.
S.McMahon 1 May 1999.

GASP run

Velocity contours
 

Mass fraction of driver gas contours

Discussion


Small CONVECT run

Velocity contours
 

Discussion

The reflected shock results look about what is expected except for feature appearing at the symmetric boundary.  This says that there is some problem with the symmetric boundary code.

Large CONVECT run

Velocity contours

Velocity surface plot
 

Discussion

The bigger problem went for much longer than would be expected from simply computing over more cells.  I suspect that somehow smaller time steps were causing further instabilities which in turn kept the time step small.  Problems with the symmetric boundary are even more evident.  The 'build-up' of velocity at the shock seems similar at both upper and lower boundaries.

With artificial viscosity fix

  1. Standard 10 x 0.038 meter shock tube problem with two species and "correct" Reynolds numbers
  2. Added a more restrictive CFL condition which takes into account instabilities from high cell aspect ratios.
  3. Added artificial viscosity correction based on the form of an artificial viscosity term which arises in the Lax-Wendroff method.

Discussion

The boundary layer is much more evident and about the right size (exact matching not done at the moment).  These results are after 18 hours calculation on four processors of zetes.

Symmetric boundary fix